The SEQDESIGN Procedure

Boundary Adjustments for Overlapping Lower and Upper bold-italic beta Boundaries

For the fixed boundary shape methods and Whitehead methods, the boundary values for all stages are derived simultaneously for each boundary. For a two-sided design with STOP=ACCEPT or STOP=BOTH, simultaneous derivation might result in overlapping of the lower and upper beta boundaries. That is, at an interim stage k, the lower beta boundary value might be greater than its corresponding upper beta boundary value. In this case, these two beta boundary values are set to missing and the design does not stop at stage k to accept the null hypothesis (Jennison and Turnbull 2000, p. 113).

For the error spending methods, the boundary values are derived sequentially for the stages. For a two-sided design with STOP=ACCEPT or STOP=BOTH, a small beta spending at an interim stage might result in overlapping of the lower and upper beta boundaries for the two corresponding one-sided tests. Specifically, this form of overlapping occurs at an interim stage k if the upper beta boundary value derived from the one-sided test for the upper alternative is less than the lower beta boundary value derived from the one-sided test for the lower alternative (Kittelson and Emerson 1999, pp. 881–882; Rudser and Emerson 2007, p. 6). You can use the BETAOVERLAP= option to specify how this type of overlapping is to be handled.

If BETAOVERLAP=ADJUST (which is the default) is specified, the procedure derives the boundary values for the two-sided design and then checks for overlapping of the two one-sided beta boundaries at interim stages. If overlapping occurs at a particular stage, the beta boundary values for the two-sided design are set to missing (so the trial does not stop to accept the null hypothesis at this stage), and the beta spending values at subsequent stages are adjusted proportionally as follows.

If the beta boundary values are set to missing at stage k in a K-stage trial, the adjusted beta spending value at stage k, e prime Subscript k, is updated for these missing beta boundary values, and then the beta spending values at subsequent stages are adjusted proportionally by

e prime Subscript j Baseline equals e prime Subscript k Baseline plus StartFraction e Subscript j Baseline minus e Subscript k Baseline Over e Subscript upper K Baseline minus e Subscript k Baseline EndFraction left-parenthesis e Subscript upper K Baseline minus e prime Subscript k right-parenthesis

for j equals k plus 1 comma ellipsis comma upper K, where e Subscript j and e prime Subscript j are the cumulative beta spending values st stage j before and after the adjustment, respectively.

After all these adjusted beta spending values are computed, the boundary values are then further modified for these adjusted beta spending values.

If you specify BETAOVERLAP=NOADJUST, no adjustment is made when overlapping of one-sided beta boundaries occurs. The BETAOVERLAP= option is illustrated in Example 110.10.

Last updated: December 09, 2022